It is about a month since Andhra Pradesh Microfinance Institutions Ordinance 2010, http://indiamicrofinance.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Andhra-MFI-... came into force. To be precise the ordinance was signed by the state governor on Oct 15th 2010 and was enforced from the following Monday Oct 18th. The sector began facing the downturn steadily since then with difficulties in loan
collection and drying up liquidity.
Through this blog space I intend to update the members with important developments and related articles along with my comments on a daily basis. Please feel free to post your comments as you deem fit.
1. Microfinance Institutions Networks (MFIN) plans on setting up a $220 million emergency liquidity facility to fund MFIs.
http://news.in.msn.com/business/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4586730
“The association is currently in talks with Small Industries Development Bank of India (Sidbi), ICICI Bank, State Bank of India (SBI) and few other banks for creating the emergency fund'. MFIN hopes to raise this corpus by next month “
I think this is a very smart move and should be supported. The interesting part though is that on the one hand the Indian banks are refusing (see the new piece below) to lend more funds to MFIs, wary of the fall outs from the impending crisis, and on the other MFIN is trying to convince the same banks to help with emergency funds. Sadly enough Indian External Commercial Borrowing norms do not permit non-bank finance companies (most large MFIs are registered as NBFCs) to borrow from foreign sources, except through instruments such as NCDs. Any foreign funds used to on-lend to NBFCs would also be treated under the same rubric. While the initiative would be a lifesaver and is much appreciated it would be good to watch and learn how they will manage to arrange that kind of money in such a short time and under existing constraints.
2. Banks refuse new loans to MFIs http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/11/18/stories/201011185298...
“There is also a fear among some banks that a similar situation could happen in other States, which is not totally baseless. There have been enquiries from the Governments of Orissa and Tamil Nadu on our recent Ordinance,'' said a senior Govt official.
If this spreads to other states, particularly Orissa and Tamil Nadu, two other highly penetrated states, more than 50% of the industry would be under stress. That would only make the fears of collapse even more real. Reserve Bank of India should step up and help MFIs with liquidity but this is unlikely to happen given the political ire the sector has attracted in past weeks and months. Nobody wants to touch the politically sensitive subject
at the moment and as the time passes by the sector’s ship is in danger of sinking more and more.
3. India’s microcredit sector faces collapse from defaults – NY Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/18/world/asia/18micro.html?_r=1
“The crisis has been building for weeks, but has now reached a critical stage. Indian banks, which put up about 80 percent of the money that the companies lent to poor consumers, are increasingly worried that after surviving the global financial crisis mostly unscathed, they could now face serious losses. Indian banks have about $4 billion tied up in the industry, banking officials say.”
“Now some Indian officials fear that microfinance could become India’s version of the United States’ subprime mortgage debacle, in which the seemingly noble idea of extending home ownership to low-income households threatened to collapse the global banking system because of a reckless, grow-at-any-cost strategy.”
The industry is too big to ignore today, although not too big to fail! Banks have significant exposure in the sector and contributed to unprecedented levels of financial inclusion through MFIs and SHGs. These efforts have been clearly overdone in some cases leading to situations of distress among some borrowing families. But one should note that MFIs reach more than 5 million families in AP alone and while some amount of wrongdoing for the want of profits and growth cannot be denied, it is nothing less than throwing the baby out with bath water when one starts comparing the current crisis with US sub-prime. The similarities stop at the nature of clients. The lending methods, purpose of loans and most importantly competing state interests do not figure in US story. There was hardly any over-leveraging and securitization of loans (<10%) which primarily caused sub-prime mess. The governments also reacted very differently in both cases. In US government attempted to bail out banks whereas in AP government chose to stifle the industry.
Stay tuned for more updates tomorrow!
Comment
Comment by Sasidhar Thumuluri on November 19, 2010 at 11:54pm
Comment by Sasidhar Thumuluri on November 19, 2010 at 12:10am © 2012 Created by SEEP Social.
You need to be a member of SEEPCommunity to add comments!
Join SEEPCommunity